do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
people who develop many different skill have more successful life than people who focus on one skill only
Our life is challenging most of the time, numerous skills help us in these challenges. The person who develops aplenty of skills has more successful life than the person who take cares about one skill. To my way of thinking, I totally agree with this statement for several reasons. Firstly, human who has multiple skills, he has better way of thinking. Secondly, several skills help the people that they have it in different kind tough of situation.
To begin with, people who own a variety of skill, have magnificent success in their life by the following. Different skills stimulate the brain cells, and generate new neural connection in the brain for each skill of them. For instance, the researchers had approved on animals’ experiments. The wolf who has more skills, has more brain cells. All of that develop when it was young. These skills like hunting, speed, reflexes and night vision. At the end of the research, they found the leader of them, he was not the strongest, but he was the wolf who have all of those skills because that wolf can think better.
Furthermore, successful life depends on numerous skills. Different skills can combine together to save your life and let you go further on your career. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Ten years ago, I had moved to the United States for the first time alone without my family, at that time I was just eight years old, I went through an accident by car. It was very fast. But nothing happens to me because I was a professional jumper athletic. Right away, I jumped over the car before it hit me by reflex in my brain without even think about it. Finally, that skill saved my life; therefor, without jumping and reflexes that I trained every day on them, I could not save my life.
In conclusion, people who tolerates different skills, have more successful life for these reasons. Firstly, skills improve different way of thinking, and generate more brain cells. Secondly, more skills will help you especially at the tough situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-07 | mattayousak | 60 | view |
- wildlife of birds 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 3
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 83
- airships vs airplane 70
- Young couples nowadays prefer to have fewer children than previous generations Most of them prefer to accomplish other goals in their life first Is this a positive or negative development 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82571428571 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53823818055 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9969542925 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4347826087 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2173913043 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38789833724 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110130108506 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106683867748 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275508654361 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115142294559 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.