Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Practice and hard work are more important to an athlete's success than natural ability and talent. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that an athlete’s success is determined by their practice and hard work, while others are of the opinion that those who have a natural ability and talent for sports are more successful. While I believe that having an innate athletic talent gives you an advantage over others, this talent only remains a potential until it is honed through hard work and training.
People with inborn talent for sports usually wish to be professional athletes later on in their lives. For example, sport prodigies can be identified in their school years if they perform exceptionally well in their physical education classes. While they may be good at sports, they can only do well up to a certain point. In order to improve from this point onward, they need to be encouraged to practice and work hard. This is also the reason why we see professional athletes training a great deal. While they may be doing the best in their field, they need to practice in order to polish their skills.
While those with inherent athletic abilities may have an advantageous position, this does not mean that those who do not have a natural talent cannot succeed in sports. They may require more practice than those who are naturally talented, but it is not impossible to succeed in their endeavors. We hear so many stories about people who lacked the ability, motivation or encouragement to take part in sports, but through their hard work and perseverance, they made it. My father is a perfect example for this. When he was young, he was so weak that people never thought he could be athletic. In fact, whenever he went to the gym and tried to work out, people would laugh at him. This did not demotivate him, instead he persisted, and after a few years, the same people who would laugh at him would admire him and ask him for advice concerning exercise.
In short, natural talent and abilities can give you an upper hand, but no one can go farther in any field without working hard and practicing. Both groups of people, those who are naturally athletic and those who are not, need to train in order to refine their skills. As long as you work hard and do not give up, you will be able to succeed.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Advertising can tell you a lot about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Today s media TV newspapers and magazines for example offer a lot of information on many topics but people do not use this information to really learn something thoroughly and in depth Use specific rea 70
- many people believe that greed or the desire to have more wealth than other people have is a bad characteristic people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind However some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a perso 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in fact, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6529562982 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42201132746 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519280205656 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3009140724 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232293695453 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837283712863 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710438108766 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17052519889 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072636458817 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.