Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professional athletes are born with talent You cannot train someone to be a professional athlete Provide reasons and examples to support your response

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Professional athletes are born with talent. You cannot train someone to be a professional athlete.” Provide reasons and examples to support your response.

Some experts comment that the athletes who perform at the highest level or craft of their game are built for it and are born with talent required for the game. However, I strongly disagree and believe that hard work can beat talent thus an individual can be trained to become a professional athlete who may have no born talent for the sport. I support my view point with three examples as follows.

First of all, the athlete should be a package of all skills that are required for performing at the professional level and these skills can be imbibed into an individual by rigorous training because practice does make a make perfect in the craft that is being practised and thus inculcate the belief as well as the talent in the individual. For instance, Basketball is assumed to be a game of athletes with great height but many examples such as the Stephen Curry of Golden Gates, who is average heighted but included in the Hall of Fame because he practised his craft and had no talents that were suitable for the sports. The above example very clearly illustrates that there are numerous examples who have made it being just because of the training and hard work even lacking the born talent required. If this belief of only people with born talents required for the sport can make it big then many of us would not have the role models that we have now.

Secondly, any person reaches it goals by determination and perseverance with a string grip on the morals as well. In present times, any person can be trained towards excellence because of the new technologies, training methods and certified trainers in the game that make the job very easy.

To conclude, the response to the prompt will depend upon the belief each person held, where some people still believe that such people with born talents have an upper edge over the people who have gained skills by training hard for it making the issue very complex to hold grounds in any one view. Any person can be trained to become a professional athlete because the skills required can be imbibed by training and the technologies to be used in the process make it easier.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the game that make the job very easy. To conclude, the response to the prompt ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 285, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...e issue very complex to hold grounds in any one view. Any person can be trained to beco...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67108753316 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39612562433 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480106100796 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4333235649 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2727272727 20.6045352989 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 5.45110844103 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216307801676 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101806573275 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369034143188 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149711542978 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521713536973 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.