Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads,so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technology thrives quickly in the last few decades. The internet, the most historical technology, changes people's lifestyle so dramatically that a part of the public regard it as a living necessary in the modern society and argue that the governments should allocate budget to make the internet free for everyone. From my perspective, it is hard to achieve and its disadvantage outweighs the benefit.
If you take the limitation of national budget in the concern, you will realize that the large cost to achieve the free access to internet hinders the construction of the infrastructures. The basis of life covers fresh air, clean water and living space. In many countries, the citizens suffer from starving, cold weather and diseases due to polluted water and air. Their physical healthy are in danger. In this case, it is far from reality to talk about free internet since it won't save the needy from death. The construction of the infrastructures including public transportation and sewage purification should be put on the top agenda instead of the internet access. The developed public transportation result in less private vehicles which emit carbon dioxide and toxic gas into the atmosphere while the sewage purification factories provide relatively clean water to wash objects.
Moreover, the internet is a large business that could benefit both the business and the people. If the government make it free to everyone, it will eventually loss many financial incomes. Companies making money by providing internet connection could contribute to wealth distribution. The tax paid to the government could be used to improve the life standard of the needy. In addition, the monopoly market on internet built by the government may lead to information supervision and speech censorship. Everything the citizens put online is under the eye of the government since the free internet connection is provided by the government. It is inevitable to leak the datas. Even if the government promises not to oversee the data transformed on the internet, the citizens still worry that they may receive penalties for their complains on the government.
In summary, the free internet does not worth the cost that the government need to invest. It not only damages the development of other truly living necessary equipments but also stimulates public worry on liberty of speech.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9481801044 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5050215199 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225595510202 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607903056644 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050073095904 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126073112353 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318866088334 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.