Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the acceleration of our social development, advancement in technology provides modern people with a more convenient life. Recently, a heated argument on whether the government should guarantee their citizen's internet access regardless of the cost. Some believe that Internet access is as important as other public facilities, such as building roads. While others hold that it's not possible and too expensive to provide Internet to people living in remote areas. From my point of view, I am inclined to the latter one as far as effective, and the economy is concerned.
First, people without Internet access usually living in remote and poor areas, the primary step of the government to do to improve their lives is to help them overcome poverty. The urgent need for people under this circumstance is absolutely no Internet access. According to the psychologist Abraham Maslow's theory of hierarchy of need, people’s desires are driven by the basic need before coming to high needs. In the pyramid in which the need is displayed, the fundamental need of them is the need for food, shelter, and clear water rather than other surfing on the Internet. It’s the government’s responsibility to guarantee its citizens a decent life. Therefore, the government should increase the income of the people. Build fundamental public facilities in this area, such as flat roads, electricity networks, and public hospitals.
Second, it’s totally unaffordable for the government to build signal towers to cover all the people. This is because building and maintaining network access is expensive, for example, 5G equipment costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. Only a few people living the remote areas thus the heavy cost of the equipment indicates the cost of accessing networks will be skyrocket. Otherwise, it is impossible for the government to cover their cost. Furthermore, if they seek subsidy from the government fund since the limited number of people in remote areas means that their voice is pretty low in the parliament. Therefore, it’s hard for them to acquire money from the government budget. Even if they are managed to persuade the government, with the unbalanced nature of population distribution in a country, a large proposition of population is centralized in big cities, urban citizens will definitely veto this proposal and the government will be forced to cut the fund.
To sum up, I believe my attitude towards the debate on whether to provide all people with Internet access is clearly elaborated by the examples and ideas presented above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 76
- salvage logging 68
- salvage logging 71
- Movies and television programs have more negative effect than positive effect on the way young people behave 90
- Amtrak is an intercity train service currently owned by the United States government There are a number of critics who believe that the government should not own Amtrak and that Amtrak should be sold to a privately owned company These critics put forward 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... the limited number of people in remote areas means that their voice is pretty low in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25485436893 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85868650903 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53640776699 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4320493203 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299599162945 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939765865111 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710007084824 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194688628655 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575328899214 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.