Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In today's complex and progressive world, the internet plays an important role all around the world. Most developed countries offer free internet to all citizens like other essential services such as creating roads. Some people believe providing internet access is as critical as other services like building roads, so governments should freely offer internet access to all citizens. I agree with this opinion. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, nowadays internet use is a universal phenomenon, and all people need to have easy access to it worldwide. Governments should offer internet without any cost for people because nowadays most of the careers and schools are online because of corona period and the students need to have internet for their online classes. If a student does not have enough money to pay for internet costs, they could not have a chance to be in their classes and learn anything. For example, my brothers' school was online last year, and one of his classmates could not be at every class because of the high internet price, and he could not get a good grade at the end of the semester. In contrast, if the internet was free for students, they could easily take classes and continue their education.
Secondly, with the development of technology, most of the careers are based on the internet .in epidemic period some people have to work from home and far from their workplaces. If they do not have this ability to access free internet, they may lose their job or face high debts for the internet. Internet jobs are beneficial not only for people but also for governments because it decreases jobless rate in the country. So they should make a suitable condition for this field and support them to continue to their career. For example, last week, the global internet faced disconnection for hours. Individuals had no access to the internet. Most famous companies such as Facebook and Amazon,… lost millions of dollars just for hours without internet. Probably if it continued more, it had the power to make more complicated conditions.
To sum up, from my vantage point providing free internet access is as crucial as creating roads and government should offer it for people without any cost, Because of two main reasons. First, most classes are online nowadays, and students need to have free internet to continue their education. Second, companies and employees have to work from their homes and far from their workplaces in the epidemic period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of the careers are based on the internet .in epidemic period some people have to w...
^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...us companies such as Facebook and Amazon,… lost millions of dollars just for hours...
^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir workplaces in the epidemic period.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in contrast, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95316159251 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52198402979 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48243559719 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9544575992 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340005983967 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115452833314 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883790943354 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232783429688 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083162207289 0.0645574589148 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.