Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Nowadays, internet has become the top concern of modern citizens. Recently, there is a heated debate on whether government should provide free internet access, some claim that it is waste of money to do it. As for me, I believe that governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Firstly, with the development of the technology, the internet will shorten the distance between people. To be specific, with some cutting edge technology like facing communication, online chatting, and voice calling. We can easily contact with our families or friends who are live in other cities or countries. Through this we can strength the link with them, and ask help from them. Take me for example, at the first year of college, I was worried and anxious, since I went alone to Chengdu which was far away from my hometown Zhejiang. And I did not know anyone here, sometimes I felt lonely. However, thanks to the video chatting application, I could call my mom and friends anytime I want, they always gave me an accompany online, and gave me some advices to dealing with the group work, communicating with others, and preparing for the presentation. Therefore, even I was in a strange environment, I still adapted it quickly because using the internet.
Furthermore, people can use internet having access to higher education. To be exact, there is no better way to teach yourself than using the internet. That's because internet makes it possible to watch videos that made by famous universities and search for information all over the world. My friend Lucy's experience is the best illustration of this. Lucy comes from a remote village in Guizhou, they have to walk at least 2 hours to go to the primary school and the high school is even farther. She has limit resource to study not to mention to study another language. But internet gives her the chances to learn english and the government offer it for free, so ever since, she watched the English videos online, reading newspaper in English, imitating the tone of how native speaker speaks. After a year, she can talk with a foreigner in English. How could she do that if government does not provide internet for free.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, I still maintain that governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment but providing food for growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 73
- TPO 60 3
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 80
- TPO 60 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People spend too much money on their pets even though there can be other good ways to spend money 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nds anytime I want, they always gave me an accompany online, and gave me some advices to dea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...teach yourself than using the internet. Thats because internet makes it possible to w...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt does not provide internet for free. In conclusion, from what has been discus...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, as for, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86284289277 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63952571038 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598503740648 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8803466872 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321072594946 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947705618685 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115696109703 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25768872904 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132061691296 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.