Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time?” Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I have done research for two years and during that time I understand what is truth based information and what is gossips and then found that fact based true information is not so interesting but it helps me to spread true information. However, some people found that gossip is interesting but in last it wastes our time and washes our brain by unreliable information. Therefore, in this statement, I am fully agreeing that reading newspaper or online news sources is waste of time. I have two reasons why I am sure that it is actually wasting our valuable time.
First, as I observed facts and reality is totally different from news and gossips because it feels like, some journalist exaggerated the events of facts to make their article readable so that more people will read the news. For example, while I was reading the news about fire accident in the biggest mall of our city, it said that the fire might flamed because of irresponsible health and safety officers but I was one of the witness in mall. In reality, the fire flamed because of burning oil near smoking area. Sadly, the news spread throughout the nation and due to journalist’s exaggerated news many people informed incorrect information.
Secondly, I think that newspapers and online news sources mostly include gossips about celebrities and politician. For our life time, by reading unnecessary news, our brain will definitely fill with trashes. Actually, by knowing what celebs doing and how they look will never going to help our future. Therefore, it is truly wasting our golden time. Especially, today, the most people, looking forward to improve themselves because of competitive society with less chance to grow. For example, these days companies looking for highly skilled and experienced individual but if we spend time reading tittle tattle, the chance to become employer will decrease.
In conclusion, from the beginning to the end, as I mentioned above, I am a hundred percent agree with the statement that reading news from unreliable source is waste of time.
- The chart below shows the average percentages of typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows an automatic photo booth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is the responsibility of the government to provide health care to everyone living in that country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Automobile eco fuel discussion 80
- Working in four days a week. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...mation. Therefore, in this statement, I am fully agreeing that reading newspaper or online news s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...out celebrities and politician. For our life time, by reading unnecessary news, our brain...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to improving'.
Suggestion: to improving
...today, the most people, looking forward to improve themselves because of competitive socie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0293255132 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71953305343 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551319648094 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3388163012 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251147234979 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935006931622 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883325584135 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159809861773 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451967776354 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.