Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past.
Politics play a vital role in society. It can be a factor for happiness of a country or an object that can crush the country. In between, I agree with the statement that students are eager to enhance their knowledge in political fields. In the following paragraphs I will illustrate my reasons.
To begin with, I believe that nowadays students know how much political people can impact the society by just a simple speech. Politicians are important people who can change a country’s destiny in so many ways. In other words, they can do it by making new laws, negotiating other countries, or by a simple speech. I believe that these attributes are very tempting for students. For instance, I remember when I was going to high school, one of my friends liked political news very much. Hence, He followed every speech, new laws, or political negotiations and he tried to analyze them. After a while, he became a significant politician in my country. As a result, He reaches his goal which was changing his own country in the best way.
Moreover, politicians usually have the power to lead a group of people and this is another feature students liked. A leader must have some special skills such as; analysis of problems, find the best way to solve issues, and can manage all aspects. Therefore, these skills make him/her a powerful man/woman. As I mentioned before, my friend liked to be a politician. Hence, after high school he attended the university in political science field and tried his best to enhance his knowledge in different fields. Now, he has a better perspective facing problems and this characteristic makes him a powerful man.
In conclusion, I discussed students’ inclination about political fields. In my opinion, they like to be a matter of happiness of their country and also they like to be a leader who can manage a group of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Farid_ha | 60 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | 30vil | 70 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | thaivu220802 | 83 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | thaivu220802 | 83 | view |
| 2016-08-17 | sinaxx | 86 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received f 70
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 55
- Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past. 60
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'plays'.
Suggestion: plays
Politics play a vital role in society. It can be a fa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88125 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8395212377 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1538590928 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.1 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144013897966 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441716532977 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552800585786 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997480195073 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047322754285 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.