Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment?
Nowadays producers try to make some television’s program which people enjoy watching them. Some people choose TV programs to enhance their knowledge by watching programs in this field. However, some others watch TV to entertain themselves in their leisure time by watching entertainment programs. In my point of view, people prefer watching TV in their free time as an entertainment. In the following paragraphs the reasons will be discussed.
To begin with, these days most of people work all day in put their time on their job and want to watch an entertainment show at night to relax themselves. They tired after a day of work and full of stress. Entertainment programs help them to release their stress and warm them up for another day of work. Moreover, studies show that watching entertainment programs such as, comedy series, talk shows, and etc. affect the body by releasing endorphins. As a result, entertainment programs help people to detach their stress.
Secondly, TV programs try to fulfill every person needs to entertain. It means that there are a lot of diverse program for every taste. Somebody enjoy watching news or somebody want to watch sports. Besides, people prefer to catch up their knowledge in a different and easy way. For example, it is really easy to surf the internet in special subject instead of waiting for the TV to show it. So, people get their knowledge from the net or some other places and watch their favorite show on TV.
In conclusion, people prefer to watch entertainment program because not only they help them to be relax, but also, they can fulfill every taste.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Thomas2028 | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 70 | view |
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by the person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by the person who often strongly ins 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics like state Olympics team 60
- Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...scussed. To begin with, these days most of people work all day in put their time on their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ams such as, comedy series, talk shows, and etc. affect the body by releasing endorphins...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'enjoys'.
Suggestion: enjoys
...verse program for every taste. Somebody enjoy watching news or somebody want to watch...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...omebody enjoy watching news or somebody want to watch sports. Besides, people prefer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99632352941 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74278504621 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6089742819 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352593333146 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118996221189 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706195486742 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228955811198 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841753911099 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.