Nowadays, an intricate, developed, and competitive world leads people to spend more time working to achieve more money and mundane matters, while the upbringing issue is not as precious as before. With this in mind, I strictly agree with this sentence because of the reasons below.
First of all, upbringing methods have been changed. Setting rules by parents are less unlike past, and they try to do like a friend to their children instead of parents. This idea has pros and cons. the merit side of this thinking is that children speak about their problems with their parents easily, but the demerit is that children are un grasp of parent's and teacher's status. So they do not respect their teacher or parent as in the previous generation, and they fall out with their teacher. For instance, my brother has a boy. he always thinks that parents should not advise children and setting rules by parents is not valid, and now my nephew speaks with his teacher out of rude and his manner has gone beyond control.
The second point is that the internet is an inseparable part of children's lives nowadays. Although the internet has different advantages like ease of working, there are also distinct disadvantages. In this way, children spend much time on the internet, and they can not experience real connectedness, so empathy and altruism will be destroyed. Internet leads children to be aggressive and depressed and exposes them to mental suffering. Accordingly, they usually do not care about the ethical issue and do not spend esteem as the children in the past did. For instance, I spent more time in the actual arena in the past, and connectedness with other people was easier for me, but now I spend more time on the internet, which has caused me to be more depressed and aggressive.
In a nutshell, needless to say, teachers are revered persons who are a precious investment of one society, but today's bourgeoisie has undermined moral and spiritual insight and has reduced respect. Hence I agree with this statement that Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...f parents. This idea has pros and cons. the merit side of this thinking is that chi...
^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...er. For instance, my brother has a boy. he always thinks that parents should not a...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epressed and aggressive. In a nutshell, needless to say, teachers are revered pe...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ritual insight and has reduced respect. Hence I agree with this statement that Studen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85236768802 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57513019791 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523676880223 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.844716547 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.470588235 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332553003055 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114212620204 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181248807855 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213767161034 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144008347537 0.0645574589148 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.