Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
This is the main issue between different well-developed universities and the schools that are continuing in financial poverty. The government is always favorable to the individuals providing funds needed for their election campaigns. Now it's time to think about the children and their development for the future. I think using the money for the education of young kids is essential than spending on well-developed universities and those points can be elaborated below.
Firstly, for the children to achieve their goals the basic foundation of education should be strong because that's the time when young brains are developing and can inculcate various ideas. Nowadays, many children of age 5 yrs are participating in the Spell- B competition. This can be possible when their basic understanding subjects are provided with quality. Not only students are excelling in their success in Spell-B competition but also in various fields if the education is good. Many other areas where students are not able to receive the education they wanted because of poor funding from the government and are ending up doing labor work for their daily life. So by this, we can know that importance of quality education will affect the young brains incorrectly.
Furthermore, the government should provide funding to rural schools where they don't have basic facilities to study and living. For instance, I have a friend working in a rural area school where there is no supply of water and food. Additionally, she mentioned that they even suffer due to a lack of restrooms at the school. Without minimum availabilities, students cannot excel in their studies. However, when coming to the situation of the universities, they have lots of funding programs and also official fundraisers where they don't have to bother at all. By providing money to such universities will enhance the exterior for the sight, but their infrastructure and everything has been developed earlier. Moreover, they don't need funding when compared to the schools that are in need.
All in all, I vehemently assert that spending money on young kids is beneficial to the country than spending on universities. It can develop the ideas of the young children that are useful for the country and also it helps to develop the schools which are at the greater need for basic facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...n of education should be strong because thats the time when young brains are developi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ide funding to rural schools where they dont have basic facilities to study and livi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd also official fundraisers where they dont have to bother at all. By providing mon...
^^^^
Line 5, column 724, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... been developed earlier. Moreover, they dont need funding when compared to the schoo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16052631579 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86961708527 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518421052632 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1537192104 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.210526316 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269475646571 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842574053475 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833959487306 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199307445091 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101313509105 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.