TEDs for turtles escapment
The reading and the lecture are about the TEDs used for escaping the captured turtles. The author of the reading claims about three plausible disadvantages of TEDs. The lecturer challenges all the claims made by the author and provides his point of view in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, the author says that due to the incorporation of TEDs into the shrimp nets will cause profound damage financially for shrimpers because many shrimps are escaping from the turtle passages that are caught. Moreover, he mentions that on an average, one shrimp boats catches one turtle every month. The professor counteracts the arguments made by the author and explains that the TEDs should be a vital part of the equipment on a shrimp boat. She also adds that many shrimp boats on southern coasts catch some thousands of turtles every year. Furthermore, he says that harming thousands of turtles every year is a problem. She also posits that they should think about the bigger picture rather than thinking of a single shrimp boat.
Secondly, the writer is of the opinion that shortening the time limit of the nets underwater can resolve this issue, by escaping the turtles whenever the nets are pulled towards the surface. However, the tutor implies that a time limit is impossible to enforce. He also adds that the government patrolling boats cannot monitor the shrimp boats always. To solve this issue, checking the shrimp boats having TEDs when they leave is the better option according to the academician.
Finally, the article mentions that some species with larger body parts get stuck in the escape passages with standard TEDs. On the other hand, the instructor describes that design can be modified easily without affecting the way it functions. Thus, this should not be a problem anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... three plausible disadvantages of TEDs. The lecturer challenges all the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05351170569 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46581078274 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8739573763 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256778823771 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853285852174 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103397818388 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134219426009 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645394266183 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.