Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have,but,in fact,it is a good quality for a person to have. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some opinion that taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have while others opt it is good quality for a person to have. I think making a decision on a crucial and vital subject needs a more take to weighing up all sides of aspect of the matter. In the following, I will pinpoint some outstanding reasons for my ideas.
First, important decisions which are vital and have an impact on our lives must be chosen wisely Sometimes making bad decisions have bad consequences on our lives ahead. FOR EXAMPLE, students who are at choose stage to which major to be taken must consider all the aspects and factors of their choice. If they have a strong passion for becoming a doctor must be aware of the becoming a doctor process. It needs time to spend with connecting whit a real doctor and asking them about their journey. Thus it is normal to take time to get the right choice.
Another reason that supports my idea is it ups to the person. Some people are a risk takers person and act without any care about the consequences of their choice and after that, they have to face the theme. For example, when people have a big amount of money they properly attend to take a risk and gamble their life to take risky decisions like rent their money to other people with subsidies. It almost to be failed because they take the wrong decision. I know a man who had a lot of money. He never took others' advice about his money and took a quick decision about investments in the wrong way which caused him to be homeless.
To the short long story, I think it is important to take time for vital choices and don't try to act through caution into the wind. It also needs to consult with other people who have experienced more than us and are aware of our decision's consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or and asking them about their journey. Thus it is normal to take time to get the ri...
^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tant to take time for vital choices and dont try to act through caution into the win...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3598820059 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29935657581 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5564512024 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348702360066 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109006385665 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131002493028 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23199433991 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132006856387 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.