Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that it is a good quality for a person.
In this fast-pace world, people tend to do everything as fast as possible. Wishing not to waste even minimal time, many people regard taking a lot of time making decisions as a bad habit. I have to admit it’s necessary to make quick decisions sometimes, but thinking twice before making a decision is also a good quality.
Granted, as the world is changing every day, in a lot of conditions, we need to make decision quickly and react rapidly to adapt to new environment. Only a person who makes up his or her mind quickly can seize the opportunity others fail to grasp. The success of TAOBAO, the biggest also the earliest Chinese online shopping website, serves as a wonderful example. In 1999, Its CEO decided to invest in online shopping right after eBay became popular in America. At that time, internet did not come into everyone daily use in China. Basically, no similar websites had been established. This quick decision is fundamental to TAOBAO’s development. If the CEO waited until network system prospered in China, TAOBAO could definitely not win in the fierce market competition. No wonder in some people’s opinion, spending shorter time determine things is a good quality.
However, this doesn’t equal to the perception that careful choices which cost a lot of time is meaningless. People can rush to meals needless to carefully select what to eat while they can’t rush into marriage without choose the right person. This reminds me of the tragedy of my uncle and his first wife. They felt in love at the first sight and married only a month after their first meet. Soon after moving together, they found they didn’t match each other from daily habits to life attitudes. Consequently, they got divorced. A fall into the pit, a gain in one’s wit. The next time, My uncle didn’t get married until he dated his second wife for years and knew her well. Hence we can see: decisions which affect a person’s whole life are always worth to think over. So thinking carefully and making an important decision in a long time can be a good quality.
Generally speaking, decision making is inevitable we face all the time. Both making quick decision and thinking twice are good qualities for a person. It’s a lesson to learn when to decide on the moment or spend more time checking over details.
- Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than in the past 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today are more likely to help others than young people were in the past. 90
- TPO24 Integrated Writing 66
- Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than in the past 3
- Some people believe it is a good idea to use cameras to watch and record people’s activities in public since it can increase safety; others think it has too many negative consequences and should not be used. Which do you prefer and why? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...econd wife for years and knew her well. Hence we can see: decisions which affect a pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89223057644 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66462129711 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606516290727 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0379062606 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.08 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.96 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261561705046 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691180140534 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887296877744 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18100865218 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664839499651 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.