Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Different views concerning the best strategies for teachers to use for effective learning. Some claim that the best tool is teaching skills, while others opine that the quality of the subject is more essential. Personally, I strongly agree with the former view of point. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To start with, the tutor's communication and teaching skills are more vital in learning because they boost the retentive memory of the students. Obviously, the level of understanding of the school children increases when the lecturer relates with them in a good manner. On the contrary, impacting the knowledge of the subject might only be effective if the tutor provides an appropriate environment for study. My personal experience is a compelling example. I learnt that I could recall all that is being taught in a history class because the lecturer was friendly to all the students, and he taught us with a calm attitude which I observed to have helped me to understand the subject most. If the tutor had been harsh to us in class, I would not have been able to remember what I had learnt. Thus, this indicates that the teaching ability of the educator is the most important in learning than what to gain from the subject itself.
Furthermore, relationships with learners are more crucial as the pupils will show more interest in the subject being taught. Evidently, this enhances students’ learning ability. For example, I loved mathematics in high school; even though I was not impressed by the subject, the attitude of my math teacher gave me joy anytime in class because he always told us stories before starting his teaching. If he had not used this method of teaching, I would not have had an interest in mathematics. Therefore, this demonstrates that teachers need to relate well with their students better than the subject to be taught in class.
In conclusion, the primary knowledge gained from a subject is not as important as the relationship teachers build with their students while teaching. This is because it boosts the way the students assimilate what is being taught in class and improves the learners' interest rate.
- It is better to have lots of friends than it is to have just a few friends Do you agree or disagree 60
- Some young children spend a grest amount of time practicing sports Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this Use specific reasons nad examples to support your answer 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 68
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...wing paragraphs. To start with, the tutors communication and teaching skills are m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96486486486 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75647189837 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0387253765 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.055555556 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28115348479 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885793580249 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762045062654 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178035203858 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425269399182 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.