Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently, a heated top about teacheres is being discussed. Some people assert that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays, while others don't. From my perspective, I support that teachers are equally treated and valued, whenver in the past or nowadays. The reasons are listed as follows.
First and foremost, today teachers are more and more capable and knowledgable than before. In the contemporary society, it is not big news that some elite doctors graduated from top universities are recruited as teachers in middle schools or even primary schools. In some high schools, many advanced courses that exist in universities are set for students. These elite teachers directly impart the state-of-the-art knowledge to these young students. Therefore, students get more access to avant-garde breakthroughs in the academic fields, which will reinforce their skills and broad their horizons. Nowadays teachers make equal contributions to the knowledge education of teenagers, thus their feats should never be overlooked.
Besides imparting knowledge, a more significant function of teachers is educating. Nowadays with the development of technology, students are more accessible to the lure and distraction from anywhere. For example, there is a trend that students in high school play with smart phones and browse TikTok in the class, which is obviously forbidden. Some students even browse websites full of fake news and extreme thoughts.Confronted with such situations, teachers deserve more compliments and extolment if they guide the students to behave well and concentrate on courses in time. It is their responsibility to help teenagers shape values and avoid traps in the society. Teachers are more and more responsible for educating and what they contribute to the growth of youth can hardly be overemphasized.
From what has been talked above, I firmly support the view that teachers are equally appreciated and valued by society whenever in the past or nowdays. Their responsibility of imparting knowledge and educating young people deserve applauds from everyone.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Amtrak 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t than they were nowadays, while others dont. From my perspective, I support that te...
^^^^
Line 8, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Confronted
... full of fake news and extreme thoughts.Confronted with such situations, teachers deserve ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56441717791 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04541137908 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555214723926 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5915384246 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247431894803 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784194740791 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831049947345 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166426269253 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871419662188 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.