Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, it is undeniable that the majority of technologies play a key role in many aspects of life. However, some people now argue that modern technology is damaging children's creativity. As far as I am concerned, it seems possible, but I strongly disagree with such a notion. I believe that technologies, in fact, support education and improve people's creativity. This essay will provide further thoughts and examples to support this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, the technology that allows children to learn quicker supports them to have more creativity. People now can easily access to useful information by state-of-the-art technology, and therefore, children are able to search and learn by themselves. As a result, the more knowledge one knows the more creativity one has. I can attest to this from my own experience. When I was a secondary school student, most students utilized the internet to search for information about academic subjects. Those vital pieces of information really help us to broaden our knowledge horizons. This means that as technology decreases the time for learning, people can more focus on creative thinking. Modern technologies also support us to gain access to large information that improves our way of innovating than before.
Secondly, another perspective that supports my standpoint is that technology broadens children's perception. On the contrary, children in the past were lived in conventional society, and they are rarely allowed to think in a creative way. Now, children around the world can readily receive information from other parts of the world; they are connected by technologies such as television and the internet. Both children and adults thus know wider, and this is significant for enhancing creativity because each individual constantly updates global innovation. To illustrate this, since there is a television in my house, I have usually updated daily news every day. This provides me with new progress in global societies. Furthermore, learning from plenty of news and documentaries is essential to increase our skills to carry out a particular task. Therefore, people in this generation can solve many issues with more creative solutions than those in the past generation.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that technology supports children to be more creative. This is due to the fact that instead of decreasing children's creativity, most technologies clearly support us to learn and create innovation, and they connect worldwide information for people to easily broaden their imagination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a creative way" with adverb for "creative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y, and they are rarely allowed to think in a creative way. Now, children around the world can rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44306930693 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04325718961 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8254872516 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6086956522 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204525130174 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603209482852 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447462800911 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133010159547 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278087706204 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.