Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer?
These days, different people hold different perspectives on old building conservation. There is an argument that whether the city should try to conserve its old buildings or destroy them. As far as I am concerned, I strongly believe that the city should protect the historic buildings because they are cultural representations and valuable tourist magnetizations. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this notion in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, historical architectures expose cultural and historical developments. The majority of old buildings have unique and beautiful structure. They are truly meaningful to many indigenous people. In other words, the destruction of these remarkable architectures is a significant loss as they cannot anew build up. To illustrate this, many temples in Thailand have unique decorations. Their materials are contingent on history. Some of them which are built in the period that Thailand connected with China are adorned by Chinese ceramics. These temples have hitherto told Thai art histories and cultures. For this care, most old buildings can pass the past stories to the new generations, and they obviously are educational materials to us.
Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that historic buildings are really essential for the tourism industry. They are favorite places for holiday and tourism. A number of cities in the world, such as Beijing, Bangkok, and Kyoto, have their historical architecture as the symbol of the city. Bangkok is represented by Wat Phra Kaew, the important temple in Thai history, and it is valuable to the city. It can bring enormous tourist income. If this temple is destructed, Bangkok will lose a lot of benefits. The city will benefit more by preserving its memorable old buildings than by replacing them with new unmemorable architectures.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that a city should conserve its notable buildings. This is due to the fact that they do not only represent the city’s cultures and histories, but the old architectures also support their city’s tourism industry.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48192771084 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05610401288 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.816897924 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7272727273 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21079872717 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534756401766 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596317793461 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145572645104 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640810196726 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.