Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some researcher believe that technology has resulted into less creative children and they cite that often or exceeding interaction with technology has made their brain functioning slow. I strongly disagree with this and think that today children are more creative because of the technology. I will state my reason in the following paragraphs.
First of all, technological advancement has given a opportunity for the children to try and create new things. For example, today there are numerous start up that can provide us from food to grocery to literally anything in just a few tap from our smartphone. Without the presence of technology, it would have simply impossible to execute such creative idea. In absence of such option, it will be very tough to go around our daily lives. It is important to keep in touch with technology, especially for the children as their brain is developing and have far better ideas than adults.
Secondly, technology has also benefitted children in learning sector. Now with focus on online teaching, children are supposed to think and try to solve small but real life problems. For instance, my younger sister who is in high school, as part of her assignment, told to work on how to give more comfort to passenger in public transportation system. She draw an E-rikshaw, prominent in Indian roads, which can be covered from all side with window to add cooling system. Also a plastic windshield in front to avoid the damage from the rain caused to the electrical wire system of the rickshaw. She took use of online platforms to understand the vulnerability of E-rikshaw and thus identified the problem. Technology gives an access to unlimited knowledge, which can be used by children to innovate and creative. So in my opinion, technology make children more creative.
In conclusion, it is very complex to decide that whether technology make children less creative and there are people on both side. Some suggest that there should be a restriction to limit the use of technology for the children. However, I think technology has surely added the creativity in the children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
Some researcher believe that technology has resulted into less ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ll, technological advancement has given a opportunity for the children to try and...
^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...given a opportunity for the children to try and create new things. For example, today t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tap seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little tap'.
Suggestion: little tap
...grocery to literally anything in just a few tap from our smartphone. Without the presen...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'draws'.
Suggestion: draws
...er in public transportation system. She draw an E-rikshaw, prominent in Indian roads...
^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...side with window to add cooling system. Also a plastic windshield in front to avoid ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...dentified the problem. Technology gives an access to unlimited knowledge, which can be us...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03142857143 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.823864771 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6623603405 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6842105263 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23263862472 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741088147939 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579927146269 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162780429319 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826887817277 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.