Chevalier memoirs' accuracy
The article refers to the memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt and discuss about it’s accuracy in detail. Writer propose that the details mentioned in the memoir are inaccurate, while the lecturer disagree. She thinks that all such details are correct and show exact history of Europe.
First, the writer doubts the credibility of the memoir by referring to an instance when Chevalier borrowed mony from Swiss merchant, although he mentioned that he was very wealthy. The lecturer explains that, Chevalier was indeed a wealthy person and most of his wealth was in assets, which could have taken 2-3 days to come in the form of spending money. So, according to her, borrowing money from merchants does not indicate that Chevelier was not wealthy and thus his statement about wealth is very true.
Second, the passage notes that the conversations mentioned in the memoir between Chevalier and Voltaire can not be possibly accurate, as it was written many years after their meeting. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She explains that Chevalier has written in his memoir that he recorded their conversation every night and kept all those records and while writing the memoir, he refers to those records. Also many witness has confirmed that Cheveliear referred to his old notes while documenting his memoir. So in her defence, all those conversation between Chevalier and Voltaire were very accurate.
The passage also question his escape from the Vanice prison. It state that he bribed the jailers for his escapae as he had many political friend in Venice who could have helped him. On the other hand, the lecturer disagree from this statement. She refers to the old Vanice government document regarding repairing the ceiling of the Chevalier room. She further mentioned that there were other more powerful people in the jail, so it was not easy to simple bribe for escape. In her opinion Chevalier did escape from the jails using metal piece.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ABOUT_ITS_NN[25]
Message: Did you mean 'about its accuracy'?
Suggestion: about its accuracy
...ir of Chevalier de Seingalt and discuss about it’s accuracy in detail. Writer propose that the deta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proposes'.
Suggestion: proposes
...s about it’s accuracy in detail. Writer propose that the details mentioned in the memoi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the memoir, he refers to those records. Also many witness has confirmed that Cheveli...
^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun witness seems to be countable; consider using: 'many witnesses'.
Suggestion: many witnesses
...emoir, he refers to those records. Also many witness has confirmed that Cheveliear referred ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this conversation' or 'those conversations'?
Suggestion: this conversation; those conversations
...ting his memoir. So in her defence, all those conversation between Chevalier and Voltaire were ver...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'states'?
Suggestion: states
...n his escape from the Vanice prison. It state that he bribed the jailers for his esca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05919003115 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43585819567 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9532634548 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275851482004 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877249427016 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105538159867 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171814026796 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867883792236 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.