Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With regard to the influence of advertisement specially designed for children in the age group between two and five years old, some actively point out that negative effects are unavoidable and adverts of this kind should be timely controlled. From my perspective, this proposal should be supported by all for some specific reasons.
Young children's inability to resist the temptation of these attracting advertisement can be the major reason for controlling these adverts. Advertisers always present the products by adding some interesting elements into the advertisements, which include colorful pictures, cheering music and popular cartoon characters. Therefore, this promoting way can easily engage children's attention and arouse their desire to own these products. Such is the case for my little sister Anne who watches the cartoon, Barbie the Princess broadcast by Chanel Three on weekends. When it comes to the end of the program, there is always an advertisement aiming to sell a brand of candy, which looks exactly the same as the magic wand owned by the Barbie Princess. Every time the princess wearing fairy dress shows up with the good-looking candy in her hand, Anne will beg me and my parents to buy it for her despite the suggestions from our dentists of not eating too much candy. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that the exposure to these adverts targeted at small children should be more restricted.
However, some may argue that these advertisements can better inform parents of the products available on the market, which makes it convenient for us to select proper products for children of this age. Nevertheless, the information from sources like this is not reliable enough since almost all advertisement will deliberately avoid the flaws or negative influences but exaggerate the advantages and the positive effects of these products. The bear doll I bought for my sister, as a prime example, is said to be the best present for girls because it uses pollutant-free materials to make. Its cute and furry appearance, however, causes my sister's allergy since it is easy to be dusted, which is beyond our expectation. Therefore, viewers can not fully trust what the advertisements say about their own products.
To sum up, advertisements targeting children should not be allowed on the screen, or otherwise both parents and children may suffer a lot from them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 76
- Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think is essential for daily life. Discuss both view and give your own opinions. 84
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91225477303 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592207792208 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8506937138 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168550126934 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605611896701 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529589134054 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123361968596 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479921737548 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.