These days there is a lot of debate how television had destroyed our interpersonal communication with other people. However, I strongly believed that advert of television had no effects on communication among friends. I disagree the statement with two major reason which I elaborately explain in the following essay.
To begin with, I contend that television always helps us for communication with new topics.In the past, people often talked about what they had mostly in common. Often, they wont spend much time in talking because they lived a simple lives. These days, in contrast, people had wide variety of daily current affairs to talk about. For example, me and my friends always meet every friday night for dinner. There we talk about many things like about work, incident happened in office etc, but mostly we always talk about current affairs and the world wide news, and also international sports events. Because of television we had lots of topics to discuss which enrich our interpersonal communication with our friends. I strongly believe that with out television to supply us with topics i would talked about the banal office gossip.
Secondly, I am of the opinion that television had took of all the solitary habits rather than communication with our friends. It appears that television had taken away the hobbies like reading and exercising. My own experience is an compelling example of this. I grew up in a very rural area were television signal are poor, so I spent my free times with reading books and also exercising. Now to do my under graduate studies I reached cities here after knowing TV has hundred plus topic, I left my reading habits my watching all the programs and movies in different channels. I now read no books, but as i mentioned above I had a nice communication with my friends.
In conclusion, i disagree with the statement that advert of television had took away the communication with friends. I feel this way because television provides lots of topics and current affairs that enrich our discussion with our friends and families.
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rately explain in the following essay. To begin with, I contend that television...
^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ps us for communication with new topics.In the past, people often talked about wha...
^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ways talk about current affairs and the world wide news, and also international sports eve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ways talk about current affairs and the world wide news, and also international sports eve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., and also international sports events. Because of television we had lots of topics to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...th our friends. I strongly believe that with out television to supply us with topics i w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...out television to supply us with topics i would talked about the banal office gos...
^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'talk'
Suggestion: talk
...vision to supply us with topics i would talked about the banal office gossip. Seco...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...I am of the opinion that television had took of all the solitary habits rather than ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ng and exercising. My own experience is an compelling example of this. I grew up i...
^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...eached cities here after knowing TV has hundred plus topic, I left my reading habits my...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t channels. I now read no books, but as i mentioned above I had a nice communicat...
^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tion with my friends. In conclusion, i disagree with the statement that advert...
^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...statement that advert of television had took away the communication with friends. I ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99423631124 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76632443669 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533141210375 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5055382235 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2777777778 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21690701851 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803306089723 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645043033809 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163977205607 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697223364438 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.