Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family?
There are several significant relations between the television and the relationship between individuals. Personally, I believe that the broadcasts are harming the communication of people, and occasioning friction between them. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will explore these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, human beings spend magnitude amount of time by watching videos on television rather than talking and confiding with their inmate individuals such as family members and companions. Therefore, the amount of the time people expend sharing an opinion with each other diminished enormously, which is deleterious to conversations. To illustrate this, I would like to share the experience of my parents. My family had not had television at a home until I became ten years old. In my reminiscences, I remember that we were having a friendly conversation every day. However, once we purchased it, I only look my parents watching television instead of telling me about their daily situation, which is the reason why we comprehend each other's feelings. Drawing from my own experience, communication among partners is reduced because people spend too much time watching movies or news.
Secondly, in today’s world, people are watching several types of movies from the television, which contains unsatisfactory scenes such as murder, cheating and being jealous. Moreover, these episodes on the films heavily influence the psychology of audiences. Thereby, they start showing these behaviors while communicating other individuals. Experience of my girlfriend is a compelling example of this. After she began watching k-drama which includes altercations of the couple, I recognized that attitude of the person I love is modified. She commenced being jealous of me, and consider me as I was cheating her as the main character in the film she watched does. Hence, our relationship was undercut, and frequency of conflict between us is increased. In consequence, people display the behavior that they see from the television in real life, which is the reason they undermine their friendship or situation of household.
To sum up, television has undermined people’s communication with their loved ones. This is because we learn unnecessary or even detrimental attitudes from the movies, and the time that we expend for conversation is reduced in light of television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | tm11 | 83 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | AliKopol | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-30 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-21 | Luizaminas | 76 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | DaVa20011218 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO 26 86
- TPO 25 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 79
- TPO 34 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, nowadays, human beings sp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... too much time watching movies or news. Secondly, in today’s world, people are w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 927, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r friendship or situation of household. To sum up, television has undermined peo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i feel, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45187165775 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11074280677 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6767021248 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.95 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121168026656 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355605751618 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430011546104 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727432341902 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412775014518 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.