Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Today students are more interested in politics than they were in the past
In today’s life, politic is influenced in people’s life increasingly, especially for students cortex who aim to have high life quality. As a result, politics play a very crucial role in their life. the ever-increasing importance of politic in our daily life has given a rise to a longstanding controversy as to whether students are more eager to politics today compared to before, considering that it may lead to a better life for them and the society they live in. Thus, students interestingly follow the news, and try to improve their knowledge upon politics issues. By and large, it is beyond doubt that students today are more Passionate to politics as compare to before because the impacts which will affects all their social life and their economical desires. While some people believe that students are not eager about politics, others thinks opposite. I firmly believe they are more involved in politics passionately. In what follows, I will support my perspectives.
Firstly, one of the most significant reasons noteworthy mentioning here is the fact that, students have full access to many political resources compared to before. In recent years, technology is growing with high acceleration. Different kind of resources are available for every one especially students. Hence, In current environments they can exchange their ideas and refresh their point of view base on varies political perspectives. Some resources such as political websites, many social network channels are available to enhance students political point of view to talk and debate logically and freely. However, not all the resources are trustable in this case, students must have the ability to distinguish fake sources by improving their political knowledge, besides discussions with high educated persons can lean one’s to a proper destination. For example, the result of a research conducted from a known institute, the more students have access to political resources, the more they involved in political discussion, and their number of students who are curious about politics are growing. As a result, if in previous years’ students had accessed to resources as today, they would be interested to politics as they are today.
Secondly, another equally important factor is that, politics free discussion in public were not allowed, especially in universities. Old times, people could not talk about politics because of social restriction. Especially in scientific and cultural contexts. Hence, people specifically students were not passionate to debate about politics, and they were not interested to know what is going on in their country. Besides, technology was not developed as today to talk about forbidden issues through some private media. The more students had been scared of un trustable situation, the more they got away from the politics. However, those days there were many politicians who were very active in the field, they had many difficulties to be in touch with others, and transform their information to them. For instance, a professor in politic departments never could talk openly in lecture and give true extra information to students.
To sum up, considering the mentioned reasons above, one can effortlessly conclude that in order to technology improvements, and availability of more resources for students causes better circumstances to be in touch to latest politician news. also having better politic atmosphere in universities encourage students to know more about the issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...play a very crucial role in their life. the ever-increasing importance of politic i...
^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...en a rise to a longstanding controversy as to whether students are more eager to politics tod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terested to politics as they are today. Secondly, another equally important fact...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...ses better circumstances to be in touch to latest politician news. also having better pol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... be in touch to latest politician news. also having better politic atmosphere in uni...
^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: also,
... be in touch to latest politician news. also having better politic atmosphere in uni...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, by and large, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2963.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4168190128 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93626959946 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491773308958 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 950.4 618.680645161 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5029818058 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.961538462 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0384615385 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88461538462 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302352033592 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091326146369 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659050372095 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193471439509 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511309016702 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.