Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, People are moving towards green revolution and trying to control the pollution. However, controlling population doesn't mean less car. I completely disagree with the prompt that there will be a fewer cars than today in coming twenty years for the following three reasons.
Firstly, there will be more cars than today because the population is increasing rapidly and will require more cars to commute. For example, In India the population has increased thrice in last ten years. More people means more cars. Also the records show that in last ten years there had been 200 percent increase in the sale of car. Thus, in future there will not be decrease in the number of cars.
Secondly, the lifestyle of people has been improving and people buy cars to show off their wealth. Cars are meant to share rides, but today in rich families each individual owns a car. For example, In twenty century only rich people could afford cars and that too one car a family. But today in some rich families each family member owns a car. Even , school childern have cars along with a driver. Therefore, as people are progessing, their life style is improving and hence the cars are alslo increasing.
Lastly, the allotment of parking space and less maintenance promotes people to buy cars. Earlier, In metro cities like Mumbai, car parking was a major issue. Due to construction of proper parking area along the road side and in every society people can think of buying a car. Earlier, car maintanence was costly and required a lot of care. Nowadays, maintaining a car is simple. Thus, there is no chance of seeing a fewer cars with the improving road conditions and better car maintanence services.
Hence, with the advent in technology and amenities the number of cars in near future will definitely increase.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 32
- Summarize the main points of the lecture and highlight how the lecture interacts with the text 80
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 66
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...lution. However, controlling population doesnt mean less car. I completely disagree wi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ten years. More people means more cars. Also the records show that in last ten years...
^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lies each family member owns a car. Even , school childern have cars along with a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 43.0788530466 14% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4608325715 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8515631884 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217832288768 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706717385851 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08024729296 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136961333742 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589404119199 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.