Summarize the main points of the lecture and highlight how the lecture interacts with the text.
Both the reading passage and lecture discuss whether the potrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet is the work of Rembrandt. The former argues that the painting is not Rembrandt's work and it has been removed from his official catlouge, while the latter asserts that potrait is Rembrandt's work.
Firstly, the text mentions that Rembrandt pays a keen attention to the details of the painting like dressing. While in the painting the women is wearing a white linen cap usually worn by the servants and a good quality coat with fur collar which a servant cannot buy. However, to defend the above claim, lecturer contends that the painting was examined and results of xray and pigmentation states that fur collar was added to the top of painting much after the 100 years of the painting. The reason for adding the fur collar was to increase the value of the painting and make the lady look like some former aristrocat.
Secondly, the passage mentions that Rembrandt pays a detailed attention to light and shadow and he is an expert in adjusting light and shadow. But, the face in the painting is brightend by the reflection of the light and the lower side of the face appears to be darker. However, the lecture mentions that the color inconsistency is because of the fur collar which is added later. When the fur collar is removed, the original painting illuminates women's face. The painting looks realistic.
Lastly, the text mentions that painting is done on a wood panel and the panel is made by sticking several pieces of wood. From the past records, none of Rembradts painting is painted on panel glued with pieces of wood. However, to defend the above statement, lecturer asserts that along with the fur, an additional wood panel was added to the painting to make the painting look grand. In fact the wood used to paint the women painting is the same wood by which Rembrandt's other paintings were painted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74774774775 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40599581107 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462462462462 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0209471573 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810981943129 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339684394392 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377580949667 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05373311094 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121013435029 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.