Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In this modern world, we do not disregard use of cars in our lives. Controversy exists over whether there will be fewer cars in use than today. From my vantage point, the use of car is of paramount importance in people's lives but in twenty years there will be fewer use cars because not only can it reduce air pollution, but also governments would be forced to adopt some regulations to hinder people use their cars.
First of all, It is predictable that in the future government will adopt some laws and regulations to prohibit people from utilizing their cars. Environmental problem is one of the most prominent threats to humanity, and governments are trying to reduce the negative effects of people on the environment. Therefore, it can be an imminent event that governments try to discourage people use their cars by considering some tough rules. Firstly, they can impose some taxes on using private cars. Then, if people use their cars, they would be fined and should pay some extra dues. Secondly, they can increase the cost of fuels. In addition, as time goes on, the price of fossil fuels is increasing because the amount of them in the world is diminishing. Then, governments can provide some expensive fuels for the usage of people. Then, these laws compel people to use their cars only in emergencies, or they would be encouraged to use some healthy vehicle such as bicycles. These rules can have some profound effects because not only do these laws hinder tremendous usage of fossil fuels, but they also
they help people to have a favorable environment.
Second of all, using fewer cars in the future will be causing save our time. That is to say, when time go on people do not need cars to do their work. For instance, with the progress of the internet people can communicate easily by using some facilities such as video calls. Then they would be reluctant to have frequent meetings. Similarly, people will do a lot of work with the help of internet connections. For instance, they can do some jobs in their home, and it is not necessary to go to their offices, or they can purchase their needs on the internet because that can be more time and cost-efficient. On the other hand, with the advent of super-fast technologies such as professional airplanes or trains people will not need to use their cars. People like to have comfortable and easy travels. Furthermore, they prefer to use new technologies since they would be more comfortable and cause save our time.
All in all, both the development of novel technologies and tough rules and regulations in the future would necessitate people to have fewer cars in comparison to these days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 80
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 70
- Integrated TPO 48 70
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1099, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous usage of fossil fuels, but they also they help people to have a favorable env...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7874186551 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65508520831 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433839479393 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4622779212 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9565217391 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0434782609 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225861930794 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087158411837 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851300585169 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138365848327 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127732729652 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.