Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the past era, a car was the most notable innovation in human society. However, some people these days claim that there will be fewer used-cars in twenty years. As far as I am concerned, I strongly disagree with such notion. I believe that in the near future, vehicles in use, especially cars, will be rapidly expanded because they are more economical and more effective than there are in this era. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, in the modern era, the developing world is rapidly urbanizing, which means individuals will desire to commute to their workplace by cars. The city's structures, such as streets and apartment buildings, will be improved and extend to the countryside. Therefore, people will live in buildings far from their workplace than before. I can attest this from my own experience; in the past, my neighborhood where far from the city center had not more streets and cars. Most people in my neighborhood used motorcycles, or they walked to their workplace. Subsequently, the urban expansion changed this, and there are numerous streets and apartments were built near my house. Therefore, People now drive a car from their homes to the office every day, and this trend will gradually increase in the following years.
Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that in the future, vehicles will be affordable for even more people in society. Although in the past, owning a car was intricate, and it seemly was for those living in the lavish life. These days, there are plenty of cars were purchased every year. To illustrate this, ten years ago, the price of a low-class car in Thailand was double than now, and therefore, a large number of people were unable to afford one. However, after the development of the vehicle industry, cars were cheaper, and some people thus brought a new car for commuting in cities. Now, cars are the major vehicles that Bangkokians use.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that in the course of time, cars in use are, inevitably, increased than today. This is due to the fact that the world is rapidly urbanizing, and the price of cars will lower and become more affordable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 97
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...and was double than now, and therefore, a large number of people were unable to afford one. Howev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91842105263 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63085647978 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0929244859 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.45 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235573959695 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771978288027 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562181664738 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160085553871 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612669299185 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.