Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for a university to have advanced facilities rather than hire more famous teachers.
In the modern days, most good universities concern about their quality educations. There are many facilities that support student for effective learning. However, some people argue that the universities should focus on having advanced facilities further than hiring more professional professors. It seems reasonable, and I truly agree with such notion. This essay will provide more aspects and give more examples to support this idea.
First and foremost, advanced facilities are helpful for both students and public. These days, many universities in the world are the significant public space for their city and other people who are not students. They allow people to have a connection with facilities. Therefore, it will benefit for the large scale.
To illustrate this, my past university, known as Chulalongkorn University, have many accommodation that allow other people to utilize them. Printing center and library are included, and these are certainly helpful not only for students in university.
Secondly, good facilities are comfortable to whenever students want. This is because most famous teachers have their permanent time. They have obvious work schedule that are not flexible for all students. Therefore, it is impossible to request advises from teacher every time. I can attest this from my experience, when I studied at university, all students had an identity code that for login to an information center every time. They can connect to main facilities of education such as main library information of university, fitness center or other helpful services.additionally, students can search more the information for their project whenever they desire, so facilities will comprehensive help students more than famous teachers.
In conclusion, I totally agree that advanced facilities are essential for a university. This is because not only their flexible time to use but also their scope that wider help in public scale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | thakannv | 40 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Imagine Ho | 92 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the opinion: People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. 70
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 97
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun accommodation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many accommodations'.
Suggestion: many accommodations
...known as Chulalongkorn University, have many accommodation that allow other people to utilize them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56040268456 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97329828306 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.2901929215 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2105263158 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259662987114 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826525226266 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681694412117 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147049336308 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085554750176 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.