Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking
courses.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer
In present-day societies, education has played a prominent role all around the world. Owing to paramount importance, a large number of scientists have been always searching for ways to enhance educational systems. A controversial question which deserves some words here is that whether universities take obligation that final term students must select a course which teaches them how to speak in societies or not. I assume that passing public discussion lessons bring several positive points for individuals. In the following, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor into account is that students need to learn how to present their capabilities in critical situations. To shed more light on this matter, young people who are studying at universities will become important people such as nurses, engineers, doctors in the not-so-distance future so that they would enter to the significant situation like serious and substantial factories and hospitals. In this situation, in order to for selecting as the member of those situations, they need both adequate knowledge and capability to speak in public. Consider a person who graduated from a high rank of the university as an engineer, for instance. He has adequate knowledge and information about his major, and he is a professional in chemical engineering. However, he is not able to speak in the best way when he participates in the entrance examination. In other words, if he cannot present himself both accurate and obvious, he would be rejected because he cannot show his potential and attitude.
Another equally significant point assert is that individuals must be able to defend their ideas in public and societies. To elaborate on this point, most psychologists believe that one of the important and adequate skills that people had to learn is that support their own ideas and tolerate the opposite ones. Hence, when students participate in these courses, they not only do lean how to present both their aims and ideas significantly but also learn how to withstand inconsistent viewpoints. To be noted, when individuals will participate in a huge and important company, they will become flourishing and prosperous people in their professional life. For instance, imagine a manager of a huge company with plenteous numbers of labourers and employees who cannot withstand the complaints of his or her customers, and he or she initiates debating with them instead of accepting their ideas. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, after some years, an enormous decrease will happen in the numbers of his or her clients.
Having taken all the aforementioned reasons and examples, into account, the conclusion that passing a course which teaches students how to speak in public is necessary. I believe that students not only learn wherethrough present themselves in the best ways but also learn how to respect the opposite side of their own notions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e world. Owing to paramount importance, a large number of scientists have been always searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29424307036 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99259941006 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528784648188 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5942962687 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.15 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.45 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100646065704 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301981420985 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327027466109 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674249201265 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157561554804 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.