Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this age, students are considering huge part of society. They are spending many times with friend and teachers at school. According I generally believe that classmates are more effect on pupils than educators; therefore, I disagree with this proposal. This phenomenon's have many reasons like children are the same age and having aggressive teachers. The following paragraphs by containing the main reasons, will substantiate my viewpoint.
The main reasons why I believe pupils more control with their friend is playmate as the same age as children. Since children spending many times with kids who have the same idea as children, they are more listen to the friend than teachers. Also, they have many interests in several things such as plying, style of life and many other similar items and containers. A significant example that strikes my mind is my little brother. Her name is Milad and he is 10 years old. The Milad teachers' tell to her don't eat fast food and play with computers; conversely, one of her friend, who is classmate of Milad, said to Milad junk food and plying with electrical devise don’t have negative effect on you. Therefore, he accepted advise of her friend except of teachers.
In addition, I think that children tend to listen to the friends and obey of them rather than teachers. In most time, educators advise kids in mistake ways; hence, youngsters don’t want to listen to the advice. In other words, in as much as teachers say suggestion with aggressive behavior, kids don’t like listen to them. If educators say comment with friendly behavior, juveniles would undoubtedly accept their recommend. In contrast never ever children say to each other in bad ways. A quite clear example would be myself. When I was studding in primary school, I had angry teachers. She always aggressive, so me and my classmates did not like him. Thus we never listen to the teachers.
To conclude, I generally hold the opinion that children most time influenced to friend than teachers. Where I stand from that, the children tend to person who are the same age as them; also, their friend never ever say something in rung ways.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 60 | view |
2019-12-20 | nusybah | 65 | view |
2019-11-11 | neiky.verdura | 90 | view |
2019-11-03 | marysv | 73 | view |
2019-11-03 | marysv | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...erefore, I disagree with this proposal. This phenomenons have many reasons like chil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ars old. The Milad teachers tell to her dont eat fast food and play with computers; ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on't want to listen to the advice. In other words, in as much as teachers say...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... undoubtedly accept their recommend. In contrast never ever children say to each other i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... me and my classmates did not like him. Thus we never listen to the teachers. To ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, i think, in addition, in contrast, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96694214876 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59907683391 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4241790031 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3913043478 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7826086957 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151607806608 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429265077996 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042852475529 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979620730856 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269032626245 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.