Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Universities should spend more money on improving facilities (e.g. labs, and general equipment) than on hiring famous professors
Each year, numerous ambitious students enter universities with high goals. Some academicians argue that universities should hire famous professors. They cite the industrial issues which lacking knowledgeable expertise. While others hold exactly the opposite perspective. I firmly contend that improving facilities would bring more advantages not only for universities but also for pupils. I will elaborate my viewpoint in following paragraphs.
First and foremost, universities’ rankings are exceedingly depended on published papers and their citations. Therefore, the more modern equipment provided, the more papers and grand prizes would be brought. As a result, students are able to persuade various contemporary subjects for their research, which they can submit their lateral papers in journals with high impact factors. Take my experience as an example, chemical engineering department of our university embodiment of the most up to date devices in laboratory, which I used for my thesis project. Consequently, I could publish my research in a privileged journal. Hardworking and astute pupils are fresh minds of the academic media, so administers should prime sufficient facilities to be utilized for university’s sake progression.
Secondly, most of the students see university as a gateway to a successful career. After graduation, pupils would join the army of job seekers and would bring different challenges like multiple interviews, and their adepts in resumes for competitive job market. From another pinpoint, without a shadow of doubt, universities play a prominent role in this part, the more skilled the more career availabilities for alumni. For instance, most of high paid jobs are occupied by alumni from high rank academies, which brings us to the point that high quality labs led them to be more accomplished than others. It is crucial importance for academic environments to prepare high quality machines for pupils to gain experience.
Last but not least, it should be noted that not all the professors are beneficial for teaching. Most of the students need a highly-educated professor who contemplate each step of teaching and can reply challenging questions in class as expeditiously as possible. It should be kept in mind that professors are role models for most of the pupils. According to a recent study, high profile professors not only would bring an enormous knowledge to the class but also would control the challenging situations. Classes are minor models of society; it should be a safe environment to be educated in, professors are key elements for this.
In conclusion, there are many factors that can be discussed for labs equipment and professional teachers. All in all, they both play a major role in a student’s profile, that should be consider carefully by universities’ administrators.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | atefehndi | 90 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which student must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppor 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should spend more money on improving facilities e g labs and general equipment than on hiring famous professors 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least one year to work or travel It s better than attending university straight away 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which lacking knowledgeable expertise. While others hold exactly the opposite perspe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
... in a student’s profile, that should be consider carefully by universities’ administrato...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49315068493 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17061067366 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9718092345 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170860456585 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528452093012 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442508409427 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105117552226 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436371327815 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 86.8835125448 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.