Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When choosing a job, it is more important to like the job than make a certain amount of money.
There are many kinds of jobs available in the market if you have the right skillset for it. A fraction of them may provide you enough to fulfil your needs and wants but may demand you to do a certain kind of work you may not feel is the best for you. The other variety is the kind of job which provides you with less remuneration than you can do with but gives you immense job satisfaction. Everyone goes through the dilemma of choosing one of these situations. Even though their decision depends on their personal reasons, I think it is better to choose the job which you like to do as it provides you with motivation and puts you on the correct path of career growth.
Motivation is an important attribute when it comes to working daily. If you have a job which gives you happiness, you tend to be enthusiastic to show up every day. On the other hand, if you only work for big sums of money then the biggest struggle of your day would be only coming to your workplace. Being productive in your scheduled activities would be another obstacle for you. Working only for money doesn't even encourage you perform better or learn any techniques to be faster in your outputs. It only results in you slogging for nearly a month just for the joy of the salary day.
We also need to consider the impact of the current job on our entire career track. It is important that we keep on growing and developing ourselves with every changing job. If we don't like the work we do, we don't put in enough hard work to learn from it, eventually resulting in negligence of long-term impact it has on our professional journey. If we sharpen the edge, we have using our workplace, we land better job offers over the course of time. Better expertise leads to greater earnings. We cannot grow in an environment we don't like working in the first place, which diminishes the likelihood of the earning hike or another better opportunity.
Hence, choosing the job we like is the best option when we look at a time of 4 to 5 decades. Working only for money may be beneficial in the short term but only leads to bigger problems when considered as an option for an entire career. It is recommended to everyone that they should choose their interest in the first place rather than running after the amount it pays you.
- read the passage listen to the lecture and say how the lecture relates to the passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When choosing a job it is more important to like the job than make a certain amount of money 70
- Read a passage listen to the lecture and then summarize how the lecture relates to the passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children are happier than adults 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...bstacle for you. Working only for money doesnt even encourage you perform better or le...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...urselves with every changing job. If we dont like the work we do, we dont put in eno...
^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...job. If we dont like the work we do, we dont put in enough hard work to learn from i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gs. We cannot grow in an environment we dont like working in the first place, which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, then, thus, i think, kind of, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46666666667 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44420272975 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2230033687 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279678990704 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934314622614 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730630165388 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174346631535 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784270868494 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.