Read a passage, listen to the lecture and then summarize how the lecture relates to the passage
The author fully supports the idea that the internet is changing the world for worse. The author claims that people have become less adventurous, have lesser attention spans and their critical thinking skills are decreasing. But the speaker states that the claim that people are becoming dumber is silly.
The author's first argument is that people have everything readily available on the internet and hence they have become more careful in their everyday lives. But the speaker weakens this, by saying that because of more information is available people have become more aware and exploring.
Secondly, the essayist's states that people have shorter attention spans because of all the distractions available on the internet. But the speaker casts a doubt on this by saying that, people have better multitasking skills and hence they can switch contexts more easily. If people have better multi-tasking skills, then speaker's statement doubts the credibility of the author's statement.
Finally, the author says that internet has diminished people's critical thinking and problem-solving ability as people can find all the solutions on the internet. But the speaker challenges this claim by saying that students no more rely on one source of the knowledge. Moreover if, the IQ levels have gone up by 10 points in the last 20 years, then the author's point is not supported by evidence.
- Read a passage listen to the lecture and then summarize how the lecture relates to the passage 3
- read the passage listen to the lecture and say how the lecture relates to the passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When choosing a job it is more important to like the job than make a certain amount of money 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children are happier than adults 70
Comments
okay
okay
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
... have better multi-tasking skills, then speakers statement doubts the credibility of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...statement doubts the credibility of the authors statement. Finally, the author says ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...re rely on one source of the knowledge. Moreover if, the IQ levels have gone up by 10 po...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27477477477 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6020171918 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9700647222 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0127894505007 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00619891891117 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0131795726463 0.0662205650399 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00894373650692 0.162205337803 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.008953856754 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.