Communication and group projects are undoubtedly are crucial things in human life. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether to communicate in person or by e-mail. If I were obliged to choose, I would think that communicating in person is better for several reasons, on a few of which, I will elaborate subsequently.
To begin with, I think it's much easier to talk to people face-to-face. When you interact with somebody by talking to them in person, you use your body gesture and movements to deliver your points better. I believe that my opinion is partially influenced by my personal experience. Once I was reading a book about body language and how important is it in delivering your meanings to somebody who you talk with. Actually, I used some of the methods were mentioned in the book later and suddenly people were buying my words so much easier than before. That's something you can't have in communicating via e-mail.
Secondly, in my opinion brainstorming is a very important part of a group project. Members of a group should discuss issues of the project and talking about ideas frequently every day to be agile and make a successful project. having profitable discussions is barely possible in e-mail platform. For instance, I had a friend who was working with a group of engineers on a project, once they had a very important issue in the project and they have to think together on the problem to solve it, but their communications were based on e-mail and technically they had to think about solution separately and share the results with each other.
Finally, I think communicating in person will help to use time better and make most of every minute that group members are working on the project. When you interact with people through e-mail you must wait for them to see your message and reply, most of the time people are busy with people around them and check their e-mail only once a day. You see, I remember I was working on a project and I faced a difficult problem, I knew my teammate know how to solve it but I must ask for his help by e-mail, it took a whole day to get my answer from him but if he were there so we could talk in person, the problem would be solved in no time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...tion and group projects are undoubtedly are crucial things in human life. A controv...
^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ody who you talk with. Actually, I used some of the methods were mentioned in the book late...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ng my words so much easier than before. Thats something you cant have in communicatin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...easier than before. Thats something you cant have in communicating via e-mail. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cant have in communicating via e-mail. Secondly, in my opinion brainstorming is...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...be agile and make a successful project. having profitable discussions is barely possib...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, talking about, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60598503741 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69104461754 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491271820449 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.224915021 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4375 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323279446927 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105842296196 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612101805262 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200983554609 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025651563343 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.