Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Without a shadow of a doubt, groups fulfill better outputs than individuals. The point here is to structure connections in a way to be more effective for cooperation. In this line of thought, while many people think electronic-based tools, like e-mail, can help teammates to collaborate with each other in productive way without the need of in-person relationships, I strongly disagree with this statement. In what follows, I will thoroughly elucidate the rationale which my opinion is based on.
The first and foremost reason is that people undersatand each other better and more in depth when they see and meet each other personally. It is an indisputabe fact that a perfect talk need to be accompanied by emotions. While we talk to each other in person, we convey our feelings beside our words. Thus, fellows will get our ponits completely, which is essential for effective communication. Take my own experience as a compelling example. Last year, during the outbreak of the Covid-19, I was involved in a research project with my coworkers. Due to the national restrictions, we were working on a project in a remote manner and via e-mail and other online applications. By emplying that way, we were unable to make any significant progress. It was mostly because we could not share our ideas and recieve to-the-point feedbacks. As a result, we decided to have weekly meetings, which caused a monumental change in our productivity. Had we relied on the online applications, we would failed on our goal.
Secondly, there are many limitations in communications by e-mail, which can hinder the process of cooperating. If two teammates want to review an article at a same time in order to exchange their thoughts, it is almost impossible. In addition to that, this type of communication need a high-speed and stable internet connection, which is not available eveywhere. For instance, in our country, there are still a great numbers of citites where lack online connections. Rarely could people find a good-quality internet. Therefore, it is highly recommended that we should not expect all people to have that big advantage in their living place.
The last vindicating point is that generating a meaningful communication requires a considerable amount of intimacy between peers. Although, colleagues may succeed in forming some relationships via e-mail, that relationship will not ever turned out to be a perfect friendship as well as a useful collaboration.
To put in a nutshell, I believe that if we want to satisfy our project's needs, we should have face-to-face and in person partnership. This is mostly owing to the fact that e-mail has many drawbacks that outweigh its benefits.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 610, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a remote manner" with adverb for "remote"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...trictions, we were working on a project in a remote manner and via e-mail and other online applica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 987, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'fail'
Suggestion: fail
...ed on the online applications, we would failed on our goal. Secondly, there are many ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'will' requires base form of the verb: 'turn'
Suggestion: turn
...e-mail, that relationship will not ever turned out to be a perfect friendship as well ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12300683371 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15909936217 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569476082005 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9349471015 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.96 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148147377803 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034109266585 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345368461177 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078521889654 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223532533349 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments