Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, the phenomenon of assigning tasks to a group of people or an individual has sparked a heated debate, especially among managers and employers. Although, consented by many that team-working and its correspondent impacts on individuals and society are highly beneficial, there are some serious critics too. I profoundly believe that working in a well-managed group could be more beneficial, efficient and a progressive process. I will discuss my point of view in following paragraphs.
Technically speaking, a group of specialist can come up with more desirable solution rather than a single person. Everybody has a parochial view toward the problem, hence is not able to assess the problem thoroughly. While each member of a group may be expert in a special subject; therefore, he can analyze the problem from different unique view point in comparison with his other teammates. Then, it is most probable that a group could produce a perfect and complete solution which has been revised very carefully be number of people.
Moreover, it goes without saying that as you dedicate more resources to a task, you would expect the result sooner. According to this, groups can finish their tasks more in a more time efficient manner. A manager can split up the tasks into several sub-tasks and assign a member to it, so all sub-tasks parallel evolves.
Finally, members of a group can motivate each other through collaborating on solving the problems and encouraging their colleagues. In addition sometimes, people in a group try to compete each other and the competency may result in better achievements for both individuals and group. Also, working in a group may bring responsibility for team members, because they know that their work will directly results in whole group and in reverse direction the group success goes for all of the members.
To put in nutshell, I definitely prefer teamwork instead of working solitary. Although, working as a group may have some drawbacks and sometimes groups are vulnerable to free-riding, its pros far outweigh its cons and would have great benefits for society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | wnitesh | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 33
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ms and encouraging their colleagues. In addition sometimes, people in a group try to com...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se direction the group success goes for all of the members. To put in nutshell, I definit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17251461988 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89107364649 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0611999784 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173796635269 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552648784324 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431011095784 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849654813558 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608121361467 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.