Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Young people are usually deemed as immature and they are also restricted by many of rules and laws. In this sense, some people assert that they have no influence on the future. However, I hold a different view, the reasons are shown as below.
Some people may consider that teenagers have little influence on the future of our society from these reasons. First, since the highly competitive education today, they are unable to participate in the activities that can decide the future. And, they may also claim that the political law sets the limit of the age that can vote, hence they do not have direct influences in a country's future. However, when we look into this issue deeper, we can find these are not the cases.
To begin with, in modern society, we have more ways for young people to broadcast their thought and therefore influence the future society. Thanks to the new technology, young people can post, discuss, or argue the issue on new-born platform such as web forums, Facebook, or other social media that is impossible in previous generation. The issue they raised not only traverse the limit of their age, but also have more profound impact in the society: the things they posted on the platforms are long-lasting and widespread through the whole nation or even the globe. From these, young people determine the future of the society in this indirect but profound way.
Furthermore, with the advancement of the educational system, young people are able to think logically and critically, which makes their opinions more compelling and influential. Students are trained with a range of courses at school. For example, from the experience of doing research project, students learn how to glean the data from various of sources and organize it in the way that can persuade others. And, through the discussion in the class, they acquire the ability that how to think an issue in different aspects. Consequently, in the near future, they can utilize these skills to persuade the surrounding people including their family members or even politicians.
To sum up, in the reality, the influence of young people is not as little as what people think. They can impost their influence through our new platforms and also with their rational abilities they develop at school.
- The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history 58
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 79
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data 16
- Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society s past but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes In such situations modern development sho 50
- Imaginative works such as novels plays films fairy tales and legend present a more accurate and meaningful picture of human experience than do factual accounts Because the creators of fiction shape and focus reality rather than report on it literally thei 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, of course, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9817232376 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50723173307 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511749347258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0436253145 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18823874399 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695729959551 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558749840979 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117495532314 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325594685508 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.