Nowadays, with the accelerating development of the societies, students are obliged to spend time in university to learn at least one special field of expertise. Some people believe that students should pass some history courses beside their field of study, while the others not. From my point of view, I believe that students should deal more with their expertise and in what follows I will attempt to address the most discernible reasons.
The first exquisite point to mention is that extra courses on history or others waste students' time and far them away from their expertise. Plus, there bunches of courses that students can enroll and help themselves to promote their knowledge. For instance, when I was studying on my bachelor in covol engineering major, we had to spend a lot of courses in Islamic History, and as a result I fell apart of my own major. Also, confusion was another consequence of such courses which prevent students from concentration in their own field. Nonetheless, the university could suggest voluntary courses on construction with would be much more efficient and could help us from wrong engineering calculation. Therefore, extra courses provide obstacles in the students' future.
Another point which deserve some point to mention is that grade point average of students could be threatened by irrelevant history courses. According to the thoughts of most engineer, they lack of good memory in perceptual courses and they shaped their mind to only solve numerical problems with deal more with calculations and mathematics. For example, when I was in my bachelor, I had course in history and took a bad grade (10/20). The grade critically affects my grade point average and reduces it around one point in total. Hence, that terrible experience taught me that students do not wish extra courses in history.
However, some people believe that students should get accustomed with history of their country. From my perspective, I am not a sheer advocator of only special expertise courses; I think that one or two course in history which also is not really hard is helpful. This course would increase students’ GPA and also make them acquaintance with their history.
The last but not the least reason is that students would experience frustration. There is an old saying in my country that says ‘’ Students follow their interest based on marks’’, therefore a bad grade would give them cold feet to follow their perspective and trying to flourish their abilities.
All in all, as the above-mentioned examples have illustrated, extra courses in history would not bring any opportunities to students. Not only does it waste students’ time and degrade their GPA, but also it decreases students’ enthusiasm to promote their talents. Even though one easy extra course may seem good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
...Islamic History, and as a result I fell apart of my own major. Also, confusion was anoth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s; enthusiasm to promote their talents. Even though one easy extra course may seem good.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, i think, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21132897603 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86747320645 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2301690166 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.727272727 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8636363636 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265050248304 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868124856182 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385242112908 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151307655839 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387029311726 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.