Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Always telling the truth in a relationship has been a controversial issue in the community. While some people think that always telling the truth have some serious risks, others argue that it offers a number of benefits. Though both sides have noteworthy props and cons, I believe that always telling the truth is the most important consideration in a relationship. My point of support will be revealed in the following paragraphs.
First of all, trust is a fragile notion that if you lose someone's trust, your chance to gain that trust again would be very low. Furthermore, if you tell a lie, you will eventually be caught. It will not be hidden forever. For example, when we first met with my wife, I told her some lies about my job to affect her. Later, I forgot what I told about my job and my lies exposed. Those days were the worst days of my life and I tried so hard to gain my wife's trust again. Even now, after years, I am not sure if she trust me completely.
Secondly, empathy plays an important part in relations. For instance, I grow up with a motto that "If you don't want to be treated badly, do not treat people badly". Therefore, if you don't want to be lied, basically, don't lie. Even though you think you will be upset in the end, you must be honest. It's a nobel behaviour. Being trustworthy is important.
In the light of the things that I mentioned about, always telling the truth has a vital importance in relationships and trust is a strong feeling that can make people connected and close. On the other hand, it is also a fragile feeling that you must take care of it well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Charles William | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | mirelly.meireles | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'trusts'.
Suggestion: trusts
... now, after years, I am not sure if she trust me completely. Secondly, empathy p...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... grow up with a motto that 'If you dont want to be treated badly, do not treat ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t people badly'. Therefore, if you dont want to be lied, basically, dont lie. E...
^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...if you dont want to be lied, basically, dont lie. Even though you think you will be ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...e upset in the end, you must be honest. Its a nobel behaviour. Being trustworthy is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52380952381 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56800919037 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557823129252 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2555712682 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195748716031 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595086609947 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636688672263 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129632239616 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752263722124 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.