Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
For an individual’s overall development, one must be good at extra curriculum activities like sports and social works apart from just studies. One learns myriad of life lessons and the ways he could contribute to the society when he indulges in any extra curricular activities. Since, these activities hold equal importance as studies in the society, universities and colleges should provide equal financial support for sports and social activities as they provide for classes and libraries. Although, some people might disagree with this, I completely support this claim because of following reasons.
First and foremost, when it comes to future opportunities, there are plenty of options that open up when we are well versed in all the fields like studies, sports, public speaking or social activities. The veracity of this claim can be evaluated by putting light to the mass of instances. Tv reporter, sportsman like a cricketer, footballer, etc, social activist like environmentalist are few examples of the alternative fields that person can pursue after his university. Everyone might not be good at studies. Some might be good at sports and by providing equal financial support to these activities, universities will encourage the students to put more attention to what they are good at and follow their dreams.
Furthermore, at last we all have to adhere to the social norms and what the society expects. Social activities enable an individual to contribute to the society from an early stage. One gets aware of the social problems and brainstorm to solve it or support it. Only if university supports this good work, the student will be successful in aiding the society. For an example, for supporting the flood victims in a city, students in social activity team might require fund and university should support its students to provide a hand to the drowning victims. Moreover, when it comes to sports, I believe, even when one is not pursuing it as an occupation, it still allows one to make new friends and social contacts. For an instance, I, myself being a voracious tennis player have made a lot of social contacts, which I believe is quite helpful.
Last but not the least, these activities are also source of entertainment and way of learning new aspects of life. For an instance, any university fests will consist of some sport competitions for entertainment and some social activity event to spread important social messages to everyone. The university in which I studied had these events part of any fest.
In summary, as sports and social activities contribute in abundance to an individual and the society, they must be given equal financial assistance in the university. Studies are important, but they are incomplete without these extra learning that we get from extra curriculum activities. Hence, for the betterment of everyone, these activities must face equality with respect to finances in universities and colleges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...ot the least, these activities are also source of entertainment and way of learning ne...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, in summary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20292887029 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90359159885 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493723849372 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9796143006 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.045454545 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279732940417 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826159628323 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741482093168 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169709401923 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643609185816 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.