There have appeared endless discussions over cars in the future. Car manufacturers argue that after twenty years, the number of cars will decrease. Personally, I express my disapproval of this argument.
On one hand, what takes my priority is the price of cars. It is well noted that in the next twenty years, there will certainly be a great number of innovations and upgrades to cars. Cars’ gas mileage is likely to be improved, thus reducing the amount of cash spent on gasoline. Their production costs are also bound to decrease, with help from innovations by manufacturers. As a result, there is likelihood that owning a car will become much less expensive than today. For that reason, people have fewer setbacks from buying a car, hence the number of cars will surely increase. More interestingly, the fact is that after a long period like twenty years, it is highly likely that people become more prosperous than nowadays. Correspondingly, car prices no longer become a large burden to many people, and more are able to afford a car. It follows that a larger number of people purchase cars for themselves, augmenting the car population of the world. Indeed, it is clear that there will be an increase in the number of cars within the next twenty years.
On the other hand, some people might say that due to awareness of environmental pollution, people no longer have interest in owning a car. As a consequence, this immensely reduces the amount of cars in twenty years. However, that is not necessarily the case. In fact, with the current growth of high technology, electric cars will soon become widely available. This type of vehicle do not require gasoline, hence they have little impact on polluting the environment. Furthermore, it is common knowledge that the world is developing faster as time goes by. Subsequently, in twenty years, people have higher needs for an efficient form of travelling. As a result, this gives people a larger incentive to owning cars, making them more willing to purchase cars. This leads to a greater number of car purchases, which in turn enhances the car population. By and large, the claim that the amount of cars will be greatly reduced in twenty years is intrinsically wrong.
In summary, cheaper cars, wealthier potential buyers and increase in need for cars are convincing reasons for my disapproval. It is highly recommended that car manufacturers should take my writing into detailed consideration to make a suitable decision on cars in the future.
- TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 76
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO 28 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, so, thus, well, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9880952381 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82764434863 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4552149868 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197822108422 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623532400479 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505611263655 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125192092669 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475032098587 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.