Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that only rich for resources country can be developed, however other people are sure that government have to invest money only on the education. Personally, I believe that it's more important for government to spend budget to develop people's minds. I feel this way for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First of all, children are our future. and if our future is not literate how people can be sure in bright future? For example, ages before England was rich country, France was, China was. The Europe had colonies, China had his big lands and even then high population, but what about Japan? Japan did not have anything, neither people nor soil. At one time they understood one important thing, that to be a developed country they had to invest into education. And now they are still small but high populated country with one of the biggest GDP all over the world.
Secondly, not educated people can work only on dirty jobs or make country go under. Sounds terrible but that's true. I know it from my experience. I live in Kyrgyzstan, and our country was on the 4th place for corruption. Our government has never spent money on the education and our literacy rate is really low. Because of it we have not educated people even in our White House. And they can not help the country to get out of the swam
In conclusion, I'm think that government have to invest money in to education. This is because educated people are the guarantee for the bright future and government will be able to get out of the dirty full of corruption swam.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... First of all, children are our future. and if our future is not literate how peopl...
^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e country go under. Sounds terrible but thats true. I know it from my experience. I l...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on and our literacy rate is really low. Because of it we have not educated people even ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...get out of the swam In conclusion, Im think that government have to invest mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66071428571 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40490304866 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2931331183 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175341337168 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536746244855 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580658614438 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120743201937 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597989289858 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.