Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion,
which of the following is the best thing to do?
1）Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2）Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3）Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In our society, every people is not perfect and makes mistake intentionally or unintentionally. But, a human should maintain their normal courtesy, politeness and modesty toward the human. In my opinion, people should wait for the right time instead of interrupt and in the right moment, he can talk with the teacher or meeting leader. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, we do not know the intention of the speaker. In some case, this can happen intentionally. So, without knowing the background it is not a wise idea to interrupt and say something loudly. For instance, in a project meeting of an organization the manager has to present five ideas about the project. But, some of them present more than five because to impress the higher authority and to get a promotion. Therefore, in this scenario, it is not a good idea to correct the mistake.
Secondly, it is not astute to hamper the flow of the meeting. Sometimes the speaker something express unintentionally which is not relevant to the topic. Rather, we let the lecturer continue and keep them finish the discussion on time. In particular, when I was in high school one of my chemistry teachers can not speak the name of the elements of the periodic table properly. So, the student always indirectly insult him and on the class period, they wasting time with irrelevant discussion.
Thirdly, sometimes in front of people, it is embarrassing to interrupt someone and make correct the mistake. Because every person has own individual dignity and pointing someone's mistake in a public place is really disgusting. Thus, we should wait for the person and make him correct privately. If he understands the point he will definitely reproof.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that to hold some patients and then discuss with the person. Therefore, he will understand the point and do not feel shame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... person and make him correct privately. If he understands the point he will defini...
^^
Line 17, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Therefore, he will understand the point and do not feel shame.
^^
Line 17, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stand the point and do not feel shame.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96604938272 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80938634825 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5535867732 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.619047619 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160375943946 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405516566215 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394835332945 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079733033677 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269043350993 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.