Technological boom at the dawn of 21st century has rendered information more valuable than ever. People started consuming huge amounts of data instantly. Due to this, more information is covered, reported and processed in greater scales than never before. In my view, a person must collect information from various sources to make his personal view on any topic. I feel this way for two reasons which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
First of all, tons of information is covered by every news agency around the world. However, the time and material within which the information has to be published has not increased. In the same 24 hours or 40-paged paper, much news has to be promulgated than ever before. Due to this reason, all this information is too huge in quantity to publish. Consequently, every news company has to prioritize among different types of data, to publish them accordingly. Moreover, information collected from various sources has to be sorted into programs either for TV or application, which based on varied targeted audiences and different hours of the day. In short, a person cannot grasp all information by just following a news company. In order to obtain news on various aspects, one has to listen to various agencies. My personal experience is an compelling example of this. During the final year of my college, I started preparing for GRE thinking of pursuing a M S degree in any one of United States' universities. In spite of all the regional as well as national news agencies does not cover about the United States. Therefore, I had started following news agencies of US to know the economic conditions and political climate on H1-B visa, which is granted by US embassy for students to study in US. It has helped me a lot to follow multiple news applications to know on lot of topics going on around the globe.
Secondly, news delivered by employees could be subjective. Especially in case of a controversial topic. For instance, taking any controversial government policy into consideration. People can have different perspectives on this new reform. Similarly, the news coverage gathered and reported by a set of people in any news agency, could also be subjective. On the other hand, government could also extort reporters into publishing news to their advantage. To avoid all these forms of subjective opinions, one should fix on an opinion by contemplating on different perspectives offered by many news agencies.
In conclusion, different news resources helps us to glean information about various parts of world. Although, many news resources provide news about disparate things, every person should refer different news resources for obtaining knowledge on the single same thing. Doing this we can gain overall knowledge on many things collectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ous agencies. My personal experience is an compelling example of this. During the ...
^^
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... preparing for GRE thinking of pursuing a M S degree in any one of United States ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in short, as well as, first of all, in my view, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12173913043 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94581180379 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532608695652 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4698645515 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.39285714286 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277036973836 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692805525179 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508764102517 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168896878127 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517730512547 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.