Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nothing stays the same, every moment something changes. Personally, I believe that question about profession choice always have been an issue. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore I following essay.
First of all, independent of time period place of human in finding ideal profession stays the same. Time flows and generations replace each other, but issue of profession decision stays alike. Nowadays majority of students struggle when it comes to topic of their future job, but in the past it was just the same. The only difference was about options from which you decide who to become. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Now I am a senior at high school and obviously uncertain about my future. However, when I ask my mother how she chose the profession which will provide her with finance to make a living, she says that it was difficult and she could do it only after first year of university.
Secondly, development continues from day-to-day. Every year new professions find their place to be and others lost their demand in human society, because of this changes decision of career provoke questions. For instance, in the past professions such as doctors and teacher were noble and owners of these jobs were considered as intelligent and successful; however now they are less appreciative, because new specializations such IT engineers or programmers became more popular and demanding. Consequently, people do not know what option to choose, because in the future everything can turn another way.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that determination of supreme job was and always will be an issue independent of time. This is because opportunities to make a decision now are identical to which were before, and we never know what changes to expect after time we have chosen our career.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Essay topics: extinction of living organisms in end of Triassic period 3
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ers lost their demand in human society. Because of this changes decision of career prov...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...mers became more popular and demanding. Consequently people do not know what option to choos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98697068404 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78925901185 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0464013184 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0588235294 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104977141415 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309046877864 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260718717171 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579349892108 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026987277408 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.