Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is
correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mistake makes people perfect and also people can learn from it. But, some mistakes are unintentional because of the rush. However, a plethora of people contents that people should work slowly and make sure that everything is perfect but others disagree with the statement. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I personally believe that quick work increase mistake which can have a negative impact on life. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound in the subsequent followings.
To commence with, today's world is so fast and people want to be more successful so fast. As a result, they make a mistake and some of the mistakes are not correctable. when people work fast they make the unintentional mistake which sometimes is not reversible. Besides, this kind of mistake can impact our career. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I worked in a company for two years and I was a financial officer. I job was to collect all expense of the employee and make a bill, after that the bill approved by the senior manager to pass. So, in a hurry, I did a mistake in calculating, thus after passing the bill company had to pay more than one million money which did not happen before. Therefore, the senior member started an investigation on it and found I make the mistake and they fired me.
Furthermore, work is done in a rush sometimes imperfect and people do in a less concentration. So, people sometimes forget to analysis the work deeply. Moreover, a profound and slow analysis can make work more perfect. For instance, the scientist does research on a topic which sometimes takes more than a year because they want the work more accurate. I have a brother who is a researcher working on wastewater treatment for more than five years. He models his work, then analysis and applied on the practical condition. He did every stage slowly and perfectly because a mistake can make the model in a different direction.
To recapitulate, I am on the opinion that works slowly and makes everything correct is a good character rather than making mistake by fast work because it might not changeable, can make the work imperfect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t. As a result, they make a mistake and some of the mistakes are not correctable. when peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...me of the mistakes are not correctable. when people work fast they make the unintent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me of the mistakes are not correctable. when people work fast they make the unintent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, i feel, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81798242201 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.227751504 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1739130435 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5217391304 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340777785242 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969403779802 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732292222906 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235802312093 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555640975552 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.