In the modern era, the news is regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the broad knowledge of people about their surroundings. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the question of what news to follow. Many people adhere to the view that we have to mind our own business and consider irrelevant news as a distraction or waste of time, while others take a global announcement as something serious. Ego, when it comes to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that we have to be aware as much as we can. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that we can be informed of disastrous situations throughout the world so that we can contribute, although a little, to help to solve them. In these predicaments, while some people prefer to send their help by donating money, others might want to travel to the place to give professional assistance. For instance, about two years ago, there was a massive earthquake in one of our provinces in the winter. Most of their civilians needed food, medicine, doctors, shelter, etc. Thus, others started collecting these supplies for them. Even other countries send some specialists alongside their financial help to facilitate the process of helping those miserable people get back to their regular lives.
The second equally significant point to be mentioned is that although some news may seem not to have a direct influence on our lives, they can gradually impact on our lives in the future. As a result, knowing them allows us to be prepared for their consequential effects. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About three years ago, Donal Trump was announced as the president of America. Although he did not clearly mention his political plans for relations with our country, I knew he would not get along with our regime. So, I started changing all my savings to the dollar because I was planning a trip to Europe for the next year. Consequently, Iran was sanctioned, and all other countries stop their relationships with us, which made the dollar scare and raised its price. Thus, I anticipated the future a year earlier by some news that appeared not to be relevant to my daily life, so I did not have any problem with my travel.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that following world news is vital for everybody. Because, people would become aware of some disasters and help to stop them, plus they can plan their future with wise anticipation about the news that might not seem to be relevant.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81004366812 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72891962972 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7690099092 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.904761905 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881255186378 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269460020593 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243457719689 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597741117845 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247412442981 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.