Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in the modern world, the use of the internet is growing fast between people. Some people believe that governments should notice more to public transportation, others believe that spreading internet is more vital in today's world. I, personally, am inclined to the latter idea and believe that improving wide internet access for everyone is more important than expanding public transportation. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
The first reason which comes to my mind is that with improving internet access throughout the country, people probably will need to get out of their home much less than before. There are a lot of activities which people can do on their home by use of the internet. Although, many of the people do not have access to the internet or are not capable to work with it. As a result, they should do their activities personally and use public transportations to reach to their destination. For example, my father has got a loan from the bank last year and every month he should pay money to the bank. In the past, he went to the bank by bus, which was so crowded and got a lot of time from him and made him tired. We did not have access to the internet in the city, and he could not uses it to pay his bills. Consequently, last month our city connected to the internet, then, my father now could do his bank works from home. It is no need for him to use public transportations.
Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that improving the internet has a lot of income for the government which could use for other parts of society like public transportation. As I said, nowadays, most of the works could be done via the internet of computers at home. Hence, the government does not need to spend a lot of money to hire a lot of employee for performing people's work. In addition, people do not use more cars for their transportation which leads to using fewer fule. All of them have some economic benefit for the government that could be used in improving public transportation.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned paragraphs, improving internet access not only diminish the need for public transportation but also will have to give the government some extra benefits. I hope with expanding the more internet, all people have access to high-speed internet and have a more convenient life.
- The passage claims that the population of birds is decreasing in the United States because of using pesticide by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories in the passage are unconvincing and 78
- The passage claims that increasing salt level in lake's water, which makes it hard for birds and fishes to go on living there and would transform the lake into a dead zone, would be solved the trend which is harmful to the lake's health by point 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 76
- j 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... internet in the city, and he could not uses it to pay his bills. Consequently, last...
^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...ations. Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that improving the in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of employees'.
Suggestion: a lot of employees
...ot need to spend a lot of money to hire a lot of employee for performing peoples work. In additio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, then, for example, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7119047619 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79700601186 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6517393857 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.95 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305859208069 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101965002662 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692740244329 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211525643503 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372001342349 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.